Waivers of service are quite common in family law cases in Texas.  They do exactly what they say – they waive service of process.   A waiver of service does NOT mean that the other person is not contesting anything in the case.

When I am trying to approach a divorce, child custody case, or any other family law matter in the most amicable way possible, I almost always ask the opposing party to sign a waiver of service.  This means that we will not be having a constable or private process server take the petition and citation and hand it to the person.  Instead, the opposing party is acknowledging receipt of the petition, providing up-to-date contact information for the court, and saying that he does not need to be served.  The waiver of service must be signed before a notary and filed with the court.  I generally have the opposing party return the waiver to me for filing.

In general, I have no issue with someone signing a waiver of service.  However, if you are asked to sign one, you need to read it very carefully to ensure you are not waiving any of your other rights.   I have seen waivers prepared by other attorneys that say the person is waiving the right to be notified of any future hearings or things like that.  The purpose of the waiver should be solely to waive being served and to enter your appearance before the court, nothing else.

If you someone presents you with a family law petition and a waiver of service and you plan to hire an attorney, you do not need to sign the waiver.  Instead, take the petition to the attorney.  The attorney will answer on your behalf.  This still eliminates the need to be served.

Why would we want to eliminate serving someone?  There are a few reasons.  First, most people do not want to be served, especially at work.  Therefore, asking them to sign a waiver eliminates that potentially unpleasant experience and sets the stage for a more amicable process.  Second, it costs money to serve someone.  You need to pay the clerk to issue a citation (and maybe more, depending on the circumstances), plus you need to pay for service by either the constable or a private process server.  I almost always use a private process server, as I find it to be the most effective means of serving someone.  However, if the opposing party is difficult to find or dodges service, the costs can skyrocket.

There are times when I do not use a waiver of service and move straight to serving someone.  Most often this occurs when the client needs urgent relief through some type of emergency order and/or temporary orders.  If we need to set a hearing right away, we will need to serve the other side.

If you are presented with a waiver of service and have any doubts about what you are signing, it is best to contact an attorney before signing.

facebookcover

0

In any family law case (divorce, child custody, child support, etc.), you may hear the term “discovery” used.  Although there are many kinds of discovery, this term is typically used to refer to formal, written discovery.  Common types of written discovery include a Request for Disclosure, Requests for Production, Interrogatories, and Requests for Admissions.

A Request for Disclosure is a standard set of questions that comes from Rule 194 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.  It is used in all types of civil cases, not just family law, and therefore many of the questions are not relevant in a family law case.  There is some helpful information to be gained from a Request for Disclosure, such as a list of persons with knowledge of relevant facts, so it is still common to see this type of discovery in family law matters.

Requests for Production ask a party to produce documents or other tangible things.  There is no limit to the number of requests for production a party can request, and it can become extremely time-consuming for a party to gather the requested documents.  It can also be extremely time-consuming to review the documents produced by the other party.  Examples of commonly requested documents are tax returns, school records, medical records, diaries, e-mails and texts.

Interrogatories are questions that seek a written answer from the other party.  In most case, parties are limited to serving 25 interrogatories on the other side, so it is important to make them count.  Common interrogatories include asking for a list of trial witnesses, asking for information on medical issues, or asking for specific financial information.

Requests for Admissions ask the opposing party to admit or deny a certain fact.  I normally find that people will deny almost everything based on some type of technicality, so I don’t use Requests for Admissions too often.  There are certain cases where there are facts that you really want the other party to admit or deny, so on occasion these can be helpful.

In my practice, I rarely initiate written discovery.  Most often I feel it is an unnecessary expense for the client where a lot of needless information is sought.  If there is a document or information I need, most attorneys will hand it over voluntarily.  That type of informal discovery streamlines the process tremendously.  However, if the other party serves written discovery, I will always serve written discovery on that party.  Some firms make it a standard practice to use written discovery in most cases.   If you are served with written discovery, it is important to meet the deadlines to answer or any valid objections you may have will be waived.

facebookcover

0

This morning, I sat in a courtroom waiting to do a prove up hearing with a client.  There were six cases in line before us, and all of those cases were pro se divorce prove ups.  If a person is pro se, it means he or she is representing himself or herself.  When there is a pro se divorce prove up, we know that both parties were pro se.  Of the six cases heard before us, the judge rejected five of the orders, and those people did not get divorced today.  This particular judge took the time to tab all of the pages with problems and give a good amount of information to the parties.  However, in my experience, most judges will not do that.  Many judges will simply say they cannot give legal advice but they are not going to approve the order as written.  All of the problems I saw today would have been avoided if at least one party had an attorney.

There are an abundance of do-it-yourself divorce forms out there floating around.  Although most of them are probably technically accurate, they are very vanilla and cookie cutter.  The only time I would ever recommend someone attempt to do their own divorce is if there are no children and no property or debt.

In cases involving children, the pro se forms include cookie cutter standard language regarding custody and child support.  Although a couple may be fine with standard possession and guideline child support, there are many other options out there that pro se parties would never know exist.  Is a 50/50 schedule preferable in a particular situation?  Is there a reason why the parties should have something other than guideline child support?  An attorney would be able to help answer those questions and draft a custom order that best fits the parties’ situation.  The good news is that at least mistakes related to the children can be fixed because custody and child support can be modified down the road.

With regards to property and debt, if the parties do something wrong in the divorce decree or forget to include an important provision, after thirty days it cannot be changed absent very limited circumstances.  For example, Husband and Wife divorce pro se.  In the decree, they say Wife will keep the house.  They do not know that they should include a provision that the Wife must refinance the mortgage into her own name within a certain amount of time or the house must be sold.  So, there is no such provision included.  Several years down the road, Husband decides he wants to buy a house of his own.  Guess what?  He is still listed on the mortgage of the house owned by Ex-Wife, and he cannot qualify for a mortgage for another house.  Unfortunately for Husband, there is absolutely nothing he can do to force Wife to refinance or sell the house.  He is stuck. Similarly, if Wife does not pay the mortgage or gets behind, Husband’s credit will be negatively affected.  The mortgage company could even come after Husband to pursue the debt.  He never would have been in that situation if he would have hired an attorney in the original divorce.

Divorces involve extremely complicated issues related to both children and property.  It is simply not possible for pro se parties without knowledge of family law to properly deal with those complicated issues.  Unless you have no children and no property or debt, it is highly recommended that you hire an attorney to handle your divorce.  If you and your spouse are in agreement as to the terms, that is wonderful!  However, it is still a good idea to hire an attorney to make sure the paperwork is drafted properly and to make sure you are correctly addressing all important issues.

Divorce

 

0

There are two types of property in a marriage:  separate property and community property.  Separate property is defined as anything either spouse owned before the marriage or anything either spouse received during the marriage through inheritance or a gift.  Community property is any property owned during the marriage that is not separate property.  Property issues can be very complex, and this post is designed to give just a brief overview of a few issues.

In Texas divorce cases, there is a presumption that all property is community property.  In order to prove separate property, the proponent must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the property is separate.  It will generally not be enough for one spouse to simply claim that he or she had certain property before the marriage or that it was received as a gift / inheritance.  He must show records to back it up.  Below are a few examples of separate property issues and how a party could prove them.

Example 1:  Husband owed Home 1 prior to marriage.  Wife moves into Home 1 with Husband.  Two years later, the couple sells Home 1 and uses the $50,000 proceeds from the sale of Home 1 as a down payment on Home 2.  Home 2 is now co-mingled community property and separate property.  Husband must be able to prove (a) that he owned Home 1 as his separate property prior to the marriage, and (b) exactly how much money from Home 1 was put down for Home 2.  He could show that Home 1 was his separate property by producing a deed for the house dated before the marriage and showing him as the owner.  He could show how much money from Home 1 was put down for Home 2 through closing records from the sale of Home 1 and the purchase of Home 2.  Through those records, Husband has established a separate property claim for $50,000 in Home 2.  Husband would be entitled to a dollar for dollar credit for that separate property.

Example 2:  Wife has a separate property bank account before the marriage that contains $100,000.  The account is in her name alone.  Wife marries Husband and continues to have her paycheck deposited into the account.  Her paycheck is community property, and now she is commingling community funds and separate funds.  If Wife is making withdrawals from the account over time, Wife will need to providing a tracing of the account to prove her separate property.   There are a variety of different tracing methods used in Texas.  The most common is the “community out first” rule.  This provides that all withdrawals are presumed to be community so long as there are community funds in the account.  Wife deposits an additional $20,000 into the account during the marriage.  She withdraws money numerous times, for a total of $30,000 in withdrawals.  Under the community out first rule, the first $20,000 out would be the community funds.  The next $10,000 would be her separate property.  In the end, the community would have $0 in the account and Wife would have $90,000 in separate property.  There are other methods of tracing that could lead to a different result.

Example 3:  Husband and Wife are married for 30 years.  Husband receives an inheritance of $50,000 ten years into the marriage.  Husband deposits the $50,000 into the parties’ joint bank account.  Over the years, hundreds of deposits and withdrawals are made from that account.  Twenty years later, the parties divorce.  Husband is unable to provide tracing to prove what happened to the $50,000 because it was hopelessly commingled with community funds.  Husband is most likely out of luck in trying to keep any of the inheritance as his separate property.   The community property presumption will prevail.

Separate and community property issues can be complex and far exceed what can be put into a single blog post.  It is important to have an attorney familiar with the rules and the various ways to characterize property in order to ensure that it is done right.  It is also important to have an attorney who will help you understand the cost benefit analysis of trying to prove separate property.  Is it worth it to spend thousands of dollars on a forensic accountant to trace the money in an account?  Maybe.  It depends on the amount of separate property at issue.

Divorce

0

Texas is a community property state, and there is a presumption that ALL property in the name of either party at the time of divorce is community property.  Certain types of property are classified as separate property, specifically any property owned before the marriage or any property received by inheritance or gift during the marriage.  The big problem here is proving the amount and existence of the property as separate.

For example, Husband had several 401(k)s from employers he had before the marriage.  At some point during the marriage, he rolled the 401(k)s into a new account.  He is able to show the creation of the account during the marriage and that the funds came from these other accounts.  The only way the husband can show by clear and convincing evidence that the money in the account is his separate property is to produce statements from right before the marriage and trace those accounts to their current location.  If the account has been rolled over and there is no paperwork from the prior account, this can be very difficult to do.   Husband would have a much more difficult time in this scenario if he had rolled the separate property accounts into an account co-mingled with community property.  Establishing what is separate and what is community in a co-mingled account can be extremely difficult.

If you happen to receive separate property during the marriage, either by inheritance or gift, it is advisable to keep that property in its own, separate account.  Once you co-mingle the funds, it can be hard to prove which funds were separate and which funds were community, especially if some funds have been spent or moved around.  It is also critical to keep records reflecting where the separate funds came from so you can prove that money is, in fact, your separate property.

Although very few people expect to get divorced, the bottom line is that many people find themselves in that situation some day.  The moral of the story is to keep records of separate property accounts going all the way back to before the marriage or to the date you received the separate property.

Divorce

 

0

A right of first refusal is a common term included in many divorce and child custody cases.  I highly recommend to my clients that they request a right of first refusal.  A right of first refusal provides that if the parent in possession will be unable to watch the child for more than a certain period of time while the child is not in school (or sometimes daycare), that parent must give the parent not in possession the first right of refusal to care for the child.

For example, Mom and Dad have a custody order that provides for a right of first refusal if the parent in possession will be unavailable for a period of four or more hours.  Mom is scheduled to have the child this weekend, but Mom has to work this Saturday from 9-4.  Mom is therefore unable to care for the child for a period of more than four hours.  Mom must notify Dad and give him the first option to care for the child while she is at work.  Dad has no obligation to care for the child during that time, but he will get the first choice.  If he says no, Mom is responsible for finding someone else to care for the child.

Parents can choose any length of time for the right of first refusal.  Some parents choose four hours, six hours, eight hours, overnight, or even a period of several days.

stk204273rke

0

Texas courts favor residency restrictions in child custody orders as long as both parents have shown the ability to parent the child.    In general, if a non-custodial parent asks for a residency restriction, the court is almost certain to restrict the custodial parent’s residence to the county of the court plus the contiguous counties.  However, the residency restriction would state that if the non-custodial parent moves outside of the zone, the residency restriction no longer applies.  For example, if Mom and Dad get divorced in Collin County and Mom is awarded primary custody, Dad can request that Mom (and the children)’s residence be restricted to Collin County and the contiguous counties (the counties touching Collin County).  If Dad chooses to move to California or Houston or even Tarrant County (which is not contiguous to Collin County), the residency restriction would no longer apply and Mom would be able to move anywhere she wanted with the child absent a new court order.  (If Dad in this scenario were moving to Tarrant County, he could likely get a new residency restriction in place to avoid Mom moving far away.  That would require a modification proceeding and a new order.)

If parents are awarded a 50/50 custody schedule, then a residency restriction will be placed on the children. The restriction would require both parents to live within a certain zone, which could be the county and contiguous counties, or it could be smaller.  With a 50/50 schedule, the zone is often smaller because both parents need to be conveniently located to the children’s schools.

Residency restrictions are extremely hard to get around if the other parent wants to be involved in the child’s life.  If both parties agree, you can have an order entered without a residency restriction.  However, if the parties do not agree, the custodial parent is almost certainly going to be stuck in or near the county where the court case takes place.

CPS

0

Texas is a community property state.  All property acquired during the marriage that is not separate property is community property.  Each spouse shares an undivided one-half interest in all community property.  Examples of community property include wages earned during the marriage, retirement benefits earned during the marriage, real property purchased during the marriage, and any furniture or personal property purchased during the marriage.

Under the Texas Family Code, all property possessed by either spouse is presumed to be community property in a divorce.   Either party can rebut that presumption by establishing by “clear and convincing evidence” that certain property qualifies as separate.

Property is considered the separate property of one spouse if: (1) the spouse owned the property before marriage; (2) he or she received the property as a gift during the marriage; or (3) he or she inherited the property during the marriage.  However, any income earned on separate property is considered community property.

Characterizing community and separate property can be complicated if the parties have a lot of assets and one or both had assets prior to marriage.  However, an experienced family law attorney can help wade through the property issues to help determine how everything should be properly categorized.

Divorce

 

 

0

Most (if not all) of the courts in Collin County require mediation before a trial in family law cases, including divorce and child custody cases.  Most courts in Dallas County and Denton County have similar rules in place.  Because I feel that in most cases a settlement is preferable to a trial, I almost always advise my clients to mediate, even if there is not a court order to do so.  When the parties cannot settle the case informally, mediation is a great tool to help reach a settlement prior to trial.  This saves the parties the financial and emotional costs of a trial.  In addition, the parties can agree to a variety of creative options in mediation that a judge could never order.

If your case is headed to mediation, your attorney should prepare a mediation statement for the mediator.  I always send mediators a letter explaining the issues in the case and where my client stands on those issues.  I set forth my client’s priorities and goals in the case and let the mediator know of any problems that I think could arise from the other side during mediation.  I also send the mediator the most recent offers made by each side, if offers have been made.  This helps the mediator jump right in at mediation without wasting time coming up to speed.

Mediation is generally a long and slow process.  You and your attorney will sit on one room and the other party and his or her attorney will sit in another room.  A neutral mediator will go back and forth between the parties to help facilitate a settlement.  Sometimes the mediator is in a room for fifteen minutes, and sometimes the mediator is in a room for hours.  Many mediations last a full day in family law cases.  Divorce cases with minor children usually take the longest because there are both property and custody issues that most be addressed.

The vast majority of the time my client is sure that the case has no hope of settling at mediation, and the vast majority of the time those same cases do settle.  Once a settlement is reached, the mediator will prepare a Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA) for both parties and their attorneys to sign.  The settlement can dispose of all or some of the issues in a case.  The MSA is binding, and neither side will be able to change their mind later about the terms and back out.  After the mediation, one attorney (usually the petitioner’s attorney) will prepare a final order based on the MSA (if a full settlement was reached).  Depending on the type of case, one party may have to appear in court to prove up and finalize the final order.

Divorce

0

There are certain aspects of a divorce decree that can be modified later and certain aspects that cannot.  Issues regarding the children (conservatorship, possession and access, child support, health insurance, and almost any other issues related to the children) can be addressed in a modification.  To modify, one party needs to file a Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship.  There is no waiting period for a modification, so if the parties are in agreement, a modification order can be entered almost immediately after the petition is filed.  If the parties are not in agreement, the case would follow the standard child custody case procedures.

You cannot, however, modify property or debt division from a divorce decree.  For this reason, property and debt division should never be tied to child support or custody issues.  (For example, if one party agrees to take a smaller piece of the pie in the property division in exchange for receiving higher monthly child support, this would be a huge mistake.  The monthly child support amount can always be modified later, but the person who took the smaller piece of the property pie can never go back and reclaim what was rightfully his or hers.)   This is also a very key reason why parties should consult with attorneys before agreeing on property or debt issues in a divorce.  I have seen it time and time again where someone makes a critical mistake with regards to property (usually a house) in a pro se divorce decree.  They have no way of fixing the problem down the road because you cannot modify a decree on that issue.

Divorce

1